Legal Opinion

Norton Bros. v. Nadebok

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hand

This is an action on the case brought by the appellee in the superior court of Cook county, against the appellant, to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by him while in the employ of the appellant.

The declaration consists of three counts. The first alleges that the defendant, which was engaged in the business of manufacturing tin cans, directed plaintiff to take cans from a machine known as a “body-maker,” which shaped the form of the'can, to another machine for completion; that the “body-maker” was defective, in that cans would sometimes catch or stick therein, making it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pittsburg Bridge Co. v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MiddletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. St. Louis Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Spring Valley Coal Co. v. PattingIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Illinois Southern Railway Co. v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Doerr v. Daily News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API