Legal Opinion
Barnard v. Moore
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 1, 1922No. 10,059PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Action for interest in real estate. Judgment for defendants. Error to the District Court of Montrose County, Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
jQlooRE, by the eighth clause of his will, devised land to his wife for life, remainder to his five sons and daughter “in fee simple” with a condition that if any son or daughter should die before the widow, then “the share of such child Shall pass to the heirs of such child,”'?
*403Said eighth clause contained the following:
“In the event my wife shall desire to sell said place during her lifetime, the proceeds of such sale shall be at once freed from her life estate hereinbefore devised, and shall be equally divided between my five sons and Ida V. Prickett” [the daughter] “and none other.”
After…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Henderson v. BlackburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Mutual Life Insurance v. ShipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knapp v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Blatt v. BlattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Question Submitted by the U.S Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit v. United Banks of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Burden v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Moore v. BarnardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.