Legal Opinion

Stanford v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1926No. 6 Div. 657PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This suit is by the legal representative of á minor child, and seeks to recover damages for the death of said minor caused by injuries .sustained by the mother of said child while alighting from one of the defendants’ trains through the negligence of an agent or servant of the defendant; if being charged that the mother was quick with child, the intestate, that the birth of the said child was premature, though it lived several days after its premature birth, and died' as a result of injuries sustained while in its mother’s womb.

By a legal fiction or indulgence, a legal personality is imputed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Drobner v. . PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Buel v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Clarke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bonbrest v. KotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API