Bate v. Bate
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 14 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. ' CITED Revised Statutes, chap. 37. Chitty on Contracts, pp. 61, 62, 49, 53. 2 McCord’s Ch. R. 102, McCord v. Blewitt. 2 Denio, 403, Stewart v. Trustees, &c. 3 Mar. 433, Outon v. Rodes. 7 J. J. Mar. 640, McGill v. Burnett. 6 Dana, 366, Wood v. McCann. 3 Bush, 652, Clark v. Constantine. 3 Zab. 353. 1 Met. 384, Cabell v. Cabell. 8 B. Mon. 284, Miller v. Porter. 13 Md. 90, Folck v. Smith. 15 Wis. 684, King v.…
Read the full summary
Case 14 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. ' CITED Revised Statutes, chap. 37. Chitty on Contracts, pp. 61, 62, 49, 53. 2 McCord’s Ch. R. 102, McCord v. Blewitt. 2 Denio, 403, Stewart v. Trustees, &c. 3 Mar. 433, Outon v. Rodes. 7 J. J. Mar. 640, McGill v. Burnett. 6 Dana, 366, Wood v. McCann. 3 Bush, 652, Clark v. Constantine. 3 Zab. 353. 1 Met. 384, Cabell v. Cabell. 8 B. Mon. 284, Miller v. Porter. 13 Md. 90, Folck v. Smith. 15 Wis. 684, King v. Whiton. CITED Ohitty on Contracts, ed. 1851, pp. 29, 292, 54, 51. Perry on Trusts, 817. 2 Blackstone, 297. Call’s Rep. 87…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYUR
delivered the opinion oe the court.
This record is from the Louisville Chancery Court, on an appeal taken by John T. Bate from a judgment rendered against him in that court. The action was instituted in the court below to surcharge a settlement made in the Jefferson County Court by the appellant as the administrator with the will annexed of his brother G. B. Bate. Robert T. Bate, one of the devisees, was the original plaintiff, but many of the other devisees, by an answer and cross-petition, united in the prayer of the petition.
The devisor, G. B. Bate, was a bachelor, leaving at his…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Polk v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Fogg v. QuackenbushColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
- Fogg v. QuackenbushColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
- Polk v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902