Paul Glen Chambers v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Chambers was notified that the court was considering summary affirmance, pursuant to Rule 10, and afforded an opportunity to address the merits of the cause in an opposing memorandum. He has not done so. Nonetheless, an inspection of the file and- records in this case satisfies us that the issues presented are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument.
The judgment is affirmed for .the reasons stated in the memorandum and order of the district court, 306 F.Supp. 1102 (D.Kan.1969).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chambers v. MoseleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central Soya Co., Inc. v. Cox Towing Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1976
- Greer v. St. Tammany Parish JailDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988