Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Matthews

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit. Pleas, not guilty and liberum tenementum. New assignment. Pleas to the new assignment, not guilty and liberum tenementum. Replication to the last plea of liberum tenementum, that the close belonged to the plaintiff. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The declaration alleges that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., broke and entered the plaintiff’s close situate in Fugit township, Decatur county, Indiana, and then and there turned in and upon said close a large number of hogs, &c., which hogs tore down and destroyed the plaintiff’s corn…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. BoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API