People v. Danzy

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses *672was inconsistent and incredible as a matter of law. In reviewing the record in a light most favorable to the People, we find that any rational trier of fact could have concluded that the defendant was guilty of the crimes charged (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Although minor inconsistencies appear in the testimony of certain witnesses, the assessment of credibility and the weight to be given to the evidence are…