Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Baldwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Brown; J. Bill by Joseph W. Oliver and another against Frank A. Baldwin and others for an accounting. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed August 14, 1916, to obtain a decree requiring the defendants Frank A. Baldwin, Victor M. Tuthill, and Melvin D. Baldwin to return to the plaintiffs certain shares of the capital stock of the Oliver Machinery' Company, hereinafter called the Oliver Company, which had been assigned to said defendants by the plaintiffs. The bill seeks to rescind for fraud and misrepresentation the transfer of the shares of stock made on September 3, 1912, above referred to. The alleged fraud and misrepresentation upon which plaintiffs rely as to the foundation of their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Kunzie v. NibbelinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ardis v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Causley v. LaFreniereMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Taylor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  4. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Memorial Hosp. Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
  5. Mahder v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API