Legal Opinion
Temple Sinai - Suburban Reform Temple v. Richmond
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided August 16, 1973No. 1749-AppealPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.
The question raised in this appeal is; How far has the “citadel” fallen?
The answer is: All the way!
Isidor Richmond and Carney Goldberg are architects (architects). In March, 1961, they agreed to prepare the plans and specifications for a new synagogue to be located in Cranston and to be known as Temple Sinai Suburban Reform Temple (Temple). Officials of the Temple hired Molony & Rubien Construction Company (Molony & Rubien) as the general contractors. In August, 1961, Molony & Rubien purchased the bricks which were to be part of the Temple’s exterior design from P. L. Monroe & Son, Inc.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Ritter v. Narragansett Electric CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Haley v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Romano v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Walsh v. GowingSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Ballet Fabrics, Inc. v. Four Dee Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- St. James Condominium Ass'n v. LokeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.