Legal Opinion

Chastain v. Consolidated Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1966No. 42282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ebejrhaedt, Judge.

There was no error in overruling the demurrers to the petition. It was brought substantially in the

Jack Jones form with a copy of the combination note and bill of sale to secure debt attached as an exhibit, with an allegation that the defendant had defaulted in the payment of the first instalment of the indebtedness. The instrument carried an acceleration clause automatically maturing the entire indebtedness upon default in any instalment.

There is no merit in the contention that the petition failed to disclose whether plaintiff proceeded in tort or in contract. On its face…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Young v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. FryhoferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Land v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API