T. W. & L. O. Naylor Co. v. Bowman
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal upon four grounds: (1) that there is no undertaking on appeal as required by C. S., sec. 7154; (2) that an order for a reporter’s transcript was procured, but that none has been filed or served, and no effort has been made to procure such transcript; (3) that appellant has failed to diligently *212prosecute this appeal; (4) that no reporter’s transcript or other bill of exceptions has been settled or allowed.
Respondent has sent to the clerk of this court a certified copy of the undertaking on appeal and supersedeas. It is sufficient in amount for both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clear Lake Power & Improvement Co. v. ChriswellIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Martin v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Meservy v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jordan v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- California Gulch Placer Mining Co. v. PatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Intermountain Ass'n of Credit Men v. Rexburg Farmers Society of Equity, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923