Legal Opinion

T. W. & L. O. Naylor Co. v. Bowman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal upon four grounds: (1) that there is no undertaking on appeal as required by C. S., sec. 7154; (2) that an order for a reporter’s transcript was procured, but that none has been filed or served, and no effort has been made to procure such transcript; (3) that appellant has failed to diligently *212prosecute this appeal; (4) that no reporter’s transcript or other bill of exceptions has been settled or allowed.

Respondent has sent to the clerk of this court a certified copy of the undertaking on appeal and supersedeas. It is sufficient in amount for both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clear Lake Power & Improvement Co. v. ChriswellIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Martin v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Meservy v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. California Gulch Placer Mining Co. v. PatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Intermountain Ass'n of Credit Men v. Rexburg Farmers Society of Equity, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API