Rogers v. Desa International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Ronald Rogers (Rogers) invented and patented a tree trimming device. This device is essentially a chain saw re-leasably mounted on the end of a telescoping pole. See Patent No. 5,884,403. He is now suing the defendants for patent infringement because the defendants are making and/or selling the Remington Pole Saw (RPS) a chain saw releasably mounted on the end of a telescoping pole. 1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment claiming that the plaintiffs patent is invalid. I heard oral argument on this issue on August 22 and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Clark v. Walt Disney Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Teleflex Inc. v. KSR International Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Orenshteyn v. International Business Machines, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Agrizap, Inc. v. Woodstream Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.