Legal Opinion

People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 2006No. G034799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

The County of Orange (the County) obtained summary judgment on a bail bond forfeiture, and the bail bond company appealed from an order denying a motion to vacate the summary judgment. The California Supreme Court ultimately held the summary judgment was voidable, not void, and the motion to vacate the judgment was untimely.

After the California Supreme Court’s opinion issued, the County attempted to enforce the judgment. The bail bond company refused to pay, claiming the two-year limitation period for enforcement of a bail bond forfeiture summary judgment had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. County of Orange v. Classified Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. People v. Am. Sur. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Cnty. of Orange v. Seneca Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. County of Orange v. Seneca Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. People v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API