Legal Opinion

City of Providence v. Ruckman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 23, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Webster Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

By this action, instituted by three citizens and taxpayers of the city of Providence, a permanent injunction was sought and procured restraining the city officials from issuing or selling $75,000.00 of city bonds, and the defendants have appealed.

Providence is a city of the fourth class, and as the proposed indebtedness exceeded the income and revenue for the year, the board of council was without authority' to incur the indebtedness unless empowered to do so by the electors of the city at an .election called and held as provided in subsection 34…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kash v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Ex parte City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Kern v. City of Mount SterlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Milton v. City of LawrenceburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API