Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Lamica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 29, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Upon reopening its decision for the sole purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (79 Civ 5899), the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found no substantial violations of procedural standards and it therefore adhered to its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of KudyschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API