Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1993No. CR 92-1414PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole. He appeals and, in his only point of appeal, argues that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress his confession. We affirm the ruling of the trial court on the point. Pursuant to Rule 11 (f) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, under which the Attorney General must “brief. . . any other points that appear to. . . involve prejudicial error,” the State additionally questions whether the trial court’s ruling admitting the confession into evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Godlove v. BambergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mauppin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Pace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API