Legal Opinion

Ward v. Holliday

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1910No. 16,090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district coxirt for Ouster county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Plaintiffs bet $500 on a horse race, deposited the money with defendant as a stakeholder, and lost. Before the deposit was turned over to the winner, defendant was .notified to return it to plaintiffs. He refused to do so, and they jointly sued him to recover the sum stated. From a judgment in their favor for the full amount of their claim defendant has appealed.

As a ground of reversal defendant asserts that each of plaintiffs deposited with him a separate sum, and that consequently he is not answerable to them jointly. If the technical rules of pleading and practice required each plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deaver v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Riddle v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spillman v. First BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  2. White v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API