Legal Opinion

In Re Prigge

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana

Decided March 4, 2010No. 19-60082PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

RALPH B. KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Pending in this Chapter 13 case is confirmation of the Debtor’s amended Plan and objections thereto filed by Chapter 13 Trustee and by Gregg and Malinda Pike (“Pikes”) on the ground the Plan is not filed in good faith as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3). The hearing on confirmation was held at Great Falls on December 18, 2010. Debtor Todd W. Prigge (“Prigge” or “Debtor”) filed an amended Plan and amended Schedules I and J on December 17, 2009 (Docket No. 62) and appeared and testified at the hearing represented by attorney Gary S.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deborah Seafort v. Beverly BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. In re: Barron D. Parks and Linda R. ParksUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re McCullersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. In re RodriguezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  5. In re DrapeauUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API