Legal Opinion

Edmonston v. Henry

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The note sued on should have been admitted in evidence. Defendant did not deny the execution of the note, bnt denied that he signed it. The note might have been properly executed so as to have bound him, although not signed by him. R. S., sec. 6217; Rothschild v. Frensdorf, 21 Mo. App. 318. (2) Defendant’s checks admitted by him to be genuine were admissible evidence.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The note sued on should have been admitted in evidence. Defendant did not deny the execution of the note, bnt denied that he signed it. The note might have been properly executed so as to have bound him, although not signed by him. R. S., sec. 6217; Rothschild v. Frensdorf, 21 Mo. App. 318. (2) Defendant’s checks admitted by him to be genuine were admissible evidence. The rule that certain papers are not admissible, because they raise collateral issues, is not applicable here because these were admitted to be genuine.…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

— Suit on a promissory note commenced before a justice of the peace. The execution of the note was denied on oath. On the trial of the cause in the circuit court where it had been removed by appeal the plaintiff offered to read in evidence the note notwithstanding the defendant’s denial under oath, on the ground that the language of the denial, which was that defendant “ did not sign the note sued on,” was insufficient to put in issue the execution of the note. It is true the denial does not use the statutory word “execution ” (sec. 6217), but does use the word “sign” which we think in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. First National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Feurt v. AmbroseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Doud v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. School District v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Kraemer v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of AlbingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API