Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Koenigsamen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 17, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed during the period in question. The record reveals that after his employment with the Veteran’s Administration ended due to lack of work, claimant reactivated his previous contracting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KazinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of KutalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of NorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of SierpinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of SulyokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of MeadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API