Legal Opinion

Duke v. Olson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

This is a suit brought to enforce double liability of a stockholder of a bank, tried by the court, in which judgment was against the defendant for $1,244.16, from which he appeals.

Plaintiff Duke is supervisor of banking of the State of Washington, and Farnsworth, the other plaintiff, is director of taxation and examination of Washington. The two are the successors in office of the bank commissioner of the State of Washington. They will hereinafter be called the bank commissioner. Defendant is a resident of Illinois and a stockholder of the Scandinavian-American Bank of Tacoma, Washington,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Broderick v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Hospelhorn v. CorbinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API