Legal Opinion

In Re the Custody of Bowman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1965No. 851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam.

In determining who shall have the custody of the child of a broken home- — -one of the gravest responsibilities cast upon a Superior Court judge — “the welfare of the child ... is the polar star . . .” Kovacs v. Brewer, 245 N.C. 630, 635, 97 S.E. 2d 96, 100; accord, Thomas v. Thomas, 259 N.C. 461, 130 S.E. 2d 871. In making this determination, a judge must be ever on his guard not to substitute the welfare of the parent who appeals to his sympathy for that of the child and not to succumb to the temptation to punish, at the expense of the child, the parent whom he deems the original…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Clegg v. . CleggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Spitzer v. LewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Spitzer v. LewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chriscoe v. ChriscoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Shackleford v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API