Legal Opinion

Donio v. Huberman

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 6, 1936No. 9683Published

1Opinion of the Court

Alessandroni, J.,

This action was originally brought by plaintiffs against defendants, Ralph Huberman, the owner of the car, and Ephraim Kirkpatrick, as the driver of the car and agent of his eodefendant, Ralph Huberman, to recover damages sustained as a result of negligence. No affidavit of defense was filed by defendant Ralph Huberman, and after the time for the filing of an affidavit of defense had elapsed Huber-man caused a sci. fa. to be issued to join Fogel’s Garage, Inc., as an additional defendant, the sci. fa. averring that Ephraim Kirkpatrick was not the agent of Ralph Huber-man, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Bowers v. GladsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Brown v. WinelanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API