Legal Opinion

Arsht v. Davis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1989No. 88-590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORET, Judge.

Marjorie Meyer Arsht (plaintiff) instituted the present action against her sister, Elene Meyer Davis (defendant), alleging that a 1959 transfer of real estate by plaintiff’s mother to defendant herein is void or, in the alternative, subject to collation. Defendant filed exceptions of no right of action, lack of procedural capacity, and prescription. The trial court granted the defendant’s exceptions of no right of action and lack of procedural capacity, and plaintiff has appealed.1

FACTS

Plaintiff and defendant herein are the children of Myrtle Levy Meyer, who died on January 21,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Russell v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Spiers v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Succession of KilpatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Henry v. State, Through Dept. of HealthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Riche v. Ascension Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arsht v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Arsht v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. In re the Succession of PriceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API