Legal Opinion

In Re Kragness

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 8, 1988No. 19-60062PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALBERT E. RADCLIFFE,

Bankruptcy Consultant.

This matter comes before the court upon the amended proof of claim of the Employment Division of the Department of Human Resources of the State of Oregon (ED) and the trustee’s objection thereto. The parties have consented to a determination of this matter by the bankruptcy consultant. Accordingly, this opinion is entered pursuant to Miscellaneous Order 87-21 of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

BACKGROUND

On April 6, 1987, the trustee, Gordon C. York, Inc., filed objections to numerous claims, including the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caffal Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. Braun (In Re Braun)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Coastal Alaska Lines, Inc., Debtor. Zidell, Inc. v. Daniel E. Forsch, Esq., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re RagoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. In Re NohleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
  4. Joye v. Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API