Legal Opinion

Matter of Stillwater M. St. Ry. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1902PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This proceeding was instituted by the Stillwater Mechanicville Street Railway Company to obtain an order permitting it to unite and connect the tracks of its railroad with those of the Boston Maine Railroad Company in order to facilitate the free interchanging of cars between the two roads.

The Stillwater Mechanicville Street Railway Company was organized under the General Railroad Law of this state, with the right to transport both passengers and freight, and is operated as an electric railroad by the trolley system.

The Boston Maine railroad is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Grauw v. Long Island Electric Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Buffalo, Bellevue & Lancaster Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kipp v. Davis-Daly Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hatfield v. . StrausNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Village of Fort Edward v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Arends v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API