Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gillespie v. Hynes

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1959No. 34503Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

The mistake of the trial court in this case was that it followed the rules of law repeatedly stated in the judicial precedents of this state. That, so holds the court, was prejudicial error.

The court holds in this case that a mechanic’s lien for foreclosure is, at its start, triable in equity; that if at the trial the plaintiff establishes a right to a lien for 1 cent or more it remains an equity action and the court has the right, in equity, to determine all issues presented in the case, including issues which standing alone would be triable at law. However, if the plaintiff fails to…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Stevens v. LutherNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Muller v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sharmer v. McIntoshNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McLennan v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API