Legal Opinion

ORDUNA v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 18, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00228Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ALEXANDRIA ORDUNA ) as mother and next friend of E.O., ) a minor ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00228-LEW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant ) DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS In this medical malpractice action, the United States is the Defendant pursuant to the integrated operation of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. § 233, and the Westfall provision of the Federal Tort Claims Act,

28 U.S.C. § 2679.1

Plaintiff Alexandria Orduna, mother of minor E.O., alleges that her infant’s physician’s assistant (“PA”) detected signs of physical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westfall v. ErwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Elizabeth Brown v. Delta Tau DeltaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. McLaughlin v. SySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API