Legal Opinion

Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Bowker

New York County Courts

Decided May 30, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Loren N. Brown, J.

By notice of motion and supporting affidavits, each dated April 24, 1981, the defendant and third-party plaintiff moves for various forms of relief. There is no opposition to any aspect of the motion by either the original plaintiff or the third-party defendants.

The sole issue before the court is whether it has jurisdiction to grant the third-party plaintiff certain relief requested. Specifically, the court must determine whether it has jurisdiction to allow the third-party plaintiff to amend his complaint to increase the amount claimed in damages against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. George Cohen Agency, Inc. v. Donald S. Perlman Agency, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Victory Painters & Decorators, Inc. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. George Cohen Agency, Inc. v. Donald S. Perlman Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Bowker, New York County Courts1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API