Munoz v. Alvarez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their malpractice case because of a supposed violation of a court order to secure replacement counsel or give notice of their desire not to do so. See Kreiser Constr., Inc. v. Trafford, 699 So.2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Because the order does not, as required, state that the claimed noncompliance was willful or deliberate, see Walden v. Adekola, 773 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Visoly v. Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin, P.A., 707 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and, more important, because the circumstances revealed by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. TuberoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Walden v. AdekolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Visoly v. KLUGER PERETZ KAPLAN & BERLINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Kreiser Construction, Inc. v. TraffordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deer Valley Realty v. Beck & Lee, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Cherry Roofing Enterprises, Inc. v. Diane BaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024