Legal Opinion
Riddle v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided September 21, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 88-0505-RPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, District Judge.
This matter comes before me on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The case has been thoroughly briefed and oral argument was presented on July 30, 1990. The case is now ripe for disposition.
FACTS
On a motion for summary judgment, all inferences of fact must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 96 S.Ct. 2074, 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); Helm v. Western Maryland Ry., 838 F.2d 729 (4th Cir.1988). With that in mind, the pertinent facts are as follows: Decedent Larry D. Riddle was an employee of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Diane C. Martin v. Nelson Stokes T/a Nelson Stokes Garage and Allen R. LisenbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Ellis v. Great Southwestern Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Al Shimari v. CACI International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Henderson v. MeadWestvaco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Henderson v. MeadWestvaco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009