Goldberg v. Parker
Michigan Supreme Court
Case-made from Ontonagon; Cooper, J. Replevin by . Louis Goldberg, receiver of the Brule Timber Company, a bankrupt, against John Parker. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of replevin for the alleged unlawful detention of “two dappled gray mares, two horse collars, and part of one double harness.” The facts were all stipulated except the value of the property. Four cases were instituted by the plaintiff against different defendants, but they were all submitted as one case upon the same statement- of facts. The finding of the court was as follows:
! “It appears from the stipulated facts that the Brule Timber Company, a- Minnesota corporation, engaged in business in the State of Michigan without ever having complied with the laws of Michigan…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Clay Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huron Salt & Lumber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.