Legal Opinion

Muckelrath v. Chezem

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1939No. 33576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The appellants, Muckelrath and Alexander, were sureties on a ne exeat bond executed by them as surety on a bond for $750, with Louis Chezem as principal. The bond was issued in connection with divorce and alimony proceedings instituted by Mrs. Chezem against her husband, Louis Chezem.

Upon presentation of the bill of complaint and affidavit, Hon. Edgar M. Lane, Circuit Judge of the district in which Jasper County is located, directed the clerk to issue the writ of ne exeat against Chezem, the husband, prohibiting him from leaving the State and directing the sheriff to require a bond of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bronk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  2. Edmonson v. RamseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Schreiber v. SchreiberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Rhinehart v. RhinehartMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Wolfe v. GarciaSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Pan American Surety Co. v. WaltersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Gibson v. State ex rel. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Johnson v. BarnetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API