Roberson v. McCarley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Plaintiff McCarley recovered a judgment of $4,000 against the defendant, Roberson, in an action of malicious prosecution and Roberson has appealed.
We entertain the view that no error to reverse intervened pending trial; but on the whole evidence, do conclude the damages awarded were excessive and that a remittitur should be ordered. Code 1940, Title 7, § 811. In this view, therefore, we will discuss but briefly the other assignments of error.
The matter of the continuance requested by the defendant because of absent witnesses was within the discretion of the trial court and,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Key v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ex Parte DriverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Centennial Ice Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Alabama Power Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- State v. HastieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- City of Prichard v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999