Legal Opinion
Flexport, Inc. v. Freightmate AI, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 7, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02500Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FLEXPORT, INC., Case No. 25-cv-02500-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FREIGHTMATE AI, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 203 Defendants. Zhao’s motion for leave to file a late answer to the second amended complaint is GRANTED. Because Zhao requests an extension of time to file an answer after his deadline to do so has passed, he must demonstrate “excusable neglect.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B). “To determine whether neglect is excusable, a court must consider four factors: (1)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re: Enron Corp. Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership v. Enron Corp., the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re Veritas Software Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.