Hirsch Bros. v. Stinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Affidavit for levy. Before Judge Hart. Laurens superior court. July term, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
1. It is essential to the validity of a schedule filed by the wife for the purpose of having the property of the husband set apart as exempt, under the provisions of section 2866 et sequitur of the Civil Code, that it shall affirmatively appear in the schedule that the husband refused to file the same ; and if this fact does not so appear, the schedule, though recorded, is void, aud may be collaterally attacked in any court of competent jurisdiction in which the creditors of the husband are seeking to subject the property embraced in the schedule to the payment of his debts. Mutual Benefit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marcrum v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Davis v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Mutual Benefit Building Ass'n v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. PurcellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Batson v. BenfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Sheppard v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918