Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. Starke

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 19, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-3606Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAN M. BLAYLOCK, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-3606 (TNM) v. GEORGE STARKE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Petra Smeltzer Starke, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER After Defendant Petra Starke repeatedly disobeyed discovery orders, this Court held her in civil contempt. The Court also ruled that Plaintiff Dan Blaylock was entitled to the attorneys’ fees he incurred in briefing his sanctions motion. Blaylock now requests $54,752 for his attorneys’ services. Applying the lodestar method, the Court holds that Blaylock’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API