Legal Opinion
Mizrachi v. Siegel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, dated January 6, 1988, which denied the petitioner’s application for a variance, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), entered February 8, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner is the owner of real property situated in a residence B zoning district in the Town of North Hempstead which is presently improved with a one-family residence. In 1987,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- MATTER OF FULLING v. PalumboNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Paniccia v. VolkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grando v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Levine v. KormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992