Freeland v. Ruggles
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Debt on bond. Oyer was had of the bond and of the condition, which last recites that, at the then preceding term of this Court for this county, upon the petition of the said Oliver Ruggles and one Charles Loveland for a new trial, in an action wherein the said .Tames was plaintiff, and the said Oliver and Charles were defendants, and in which the said James had recovered against the said Oliver and Charles the sum of 1230 dollars 33 cents damages, and 47 dollars 56 cents…
Read the full summary
Debt on bond. Oyer was had of the bond and of the condition, which last recites that, at the then preceding term of this Court for this county, upon the petition of the said Oliver Ruggles and one Charles Loveland for a new trial, in an action wherein the said .Tames was plaintiff, and the said Oliver and Charles were defendants, and in which the said James had recovered against the said Oliver and Charles the sum of 1230 dollars 33 cents damages, and 47 dollars 56 cents costs of suit, it was ordered by the said Court, upon the said petition, that a writ of review should issue in the said…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered to the following effect by
Sedgwick, J.
(after stating the pleadings particularly.) It appears by this record that the bond declared on was not made in conformity to the order of the Court. The order of Court was, that the bond to be given, to entitle Ruggles and Loveland to a review, should be made to secure the payment of the judgment then in being. The bond was given to secure the payment of a judgment, which might be rendered on the review. The bond, by the oyer, has become part of the declaration; by which it appears, that, if Ruggles and Loveland…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cadwallader v. EvansOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1857