Legal Opinion

The Belvidere

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided October 25, 1898No. 831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is a libel by Fred Choate and others against the British bark JBelvidere lor the recovery oí wages, and extra wages for short allowances.

1Opinion of the Court

TOULMIN, District Judge.

The libel in this case is for the recovery of wages, and extra wages for short allowance of provisions and lime juice; and so far as the libelant Julius Koleszar is concerned, also for a discharge on the ground of sickness, and consequent inability to do duty. However, Koleszar’s claim for a discharge is disposed of by the admission that he refused to go to the hospital on the permit obtained for him by the master, and that he has shipped and sailed from this port on another vessel.

The specific averments of the libel are that on the day next after the vessel sailed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Papping v. The SiriusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1891
  3. Petersen v. J. F. Cunningham Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
  4. Johnson v. KarooDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1892
  5. Wilson v. The John RitsonDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The AlbaniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API