Legal Opinion

Harroald v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1969No. 53937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

In seeking to set aside a sentence of seven years for a conviction of forgery in 1967, appellant presents these points requesting relief under Supreme Court Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R.:

That his constitutional rights were denied him because of failure to provide him counsel at the time of preliminary hearing, and prior to his waiver thereof, in Magistrate Court. That he had ineffective court-appointed counsel in these respects: he was prevented from filing a timely notice of appeal by reason of reliance upon advice and statements of counsel; his counsel failed to make opening…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wholey v. ProvynDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
  2. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API