People v. Holt
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment of conviction rendered September 17, 1997 reversed, on the law, and the information is dismissed.
*920Absent any indication that defendant consented to a trial before a Judicial Hearing Officer, the conviction obtained below lacked an “ ‘essential jurisdictional predicate’ ” (Batista v Del-baum, Inc., 234 AD2d 45, 46) and must be vacated (see, CPL 350.20; People v Theodore, NYLJ, July 19, 1991, at 27, col 5 [App Term, 2d Dept]). The assignment of a criminal case to a Judicial Hearing Officer for trial in the absence of the requisite statutory consent affects “ ‘the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BurwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Batista v. Delbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GarciaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
- People v. Abdrabelnaby (Ahmed)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. Petriashvili (Levan)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. Santana (Joel)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016