Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Nesmith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

The plaintiffs set forth in their bill in equity that they are the holders of sundry promissory notes to the amount of $19,300, of a certain corporate body known and incorporated by the name of the “ Franklin Mills,” duly organized under a charter obtained in New Hampshire, by which the said corporation were authorized to carry on the business of manufacturing cotton and'woollen goods in the towns of Franklin and North-field in said State ; and they aver that the said notes are due and unpaid, although a demand has been made upon the corporation therefor. The bill further alleges that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Pickering v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  3. Ex parte Van RiperNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Bond v. AppletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  5. Lee v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broderick v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Schell v. Youngstown Iron Sheet & Tube Co.Mahoning Circuit Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API