Legal Opinion

Chittim & Parr v. Martinez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1900No. 940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Question certified by the • Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth. District has certified to this court the following statement and question:

“A material issue in the case was whether or not a certain verbal contract alleged by the defendants had been -entered into. The plaintiff and the defendant were the only witnesses on this issue, each testifying directly contrary to the other. The court, in submitting the issue, charged the jury that the burden of proof was on the defendants to show such contract by the preponderance of the evidence.
“Was it error to instruct the jury as to the burden'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShiederTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stooksbury v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Byers Bros. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. PrestonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Producers' Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Davis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Texas Cotton Growers Ass'n v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API