Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Townes v. Rusty Ellis Builder, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2012No. 2011-CA-00164-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChandler, Justice

¶ 35. While I agree with the decision to reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, I disagree with the majority’s voiding of the Tolling Agreement. This Court has faced the issue of whether a contract may be used to shorten the period of time in which a party may bring an action. See Pitts v. Watkins, 905 So.2d 558, 558 (Miss.2005) (finding the contract unconscionable based on its shortening the statute of limitations). However, we have yet to address an attempt to contractually extend a period of limitations.

¶ 36. I do not agree with the majority’s finding that the lack of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pitts v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Harrison Enterprises, Inc. v. Trilogy Communications, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hood v. Central United Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API