Legal Opinion

Darnall v. Mullikin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

The case is called by counsel a petition to modify a decree.

It seems that in 1844 the defendant, Amelia A. Mullikin,Haem the wife of Damall, applied for a divorce, which was granted. The care and custody of their infant son, James A. Damall, was confided to the mother until the further order of Court.

This petition is by William C. Damall, the father of the infant, to have the care and guardianship of the infant awarded to him. It may, therefore, be regarded rather as a petition for a further order of Court on the subject, than as a petition to modify the decree.

After stating the divorce, the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WaldronNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bryan v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Berkshire v. CaleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Dubois v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Renard v. RenardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Sullivan v. LearnedIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API