Bischoff v. Trenholm
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Norton, J., Charleston, March, 1891. Controversy without action between Albert Bischoff and G. M. Trenholm,. assignee of J. H. E. Stelling.
Read the full summary
Before Norton, J., Charleston, March, 1891. Controversy without action between Albert Bischoff and G. M. Trenholm,. assignee of J. H. E. Stelling. The deed of assignment was in the usual form, directing the assignee to take possession of the property and convert it into money, the proceeds, after paying mortgages out of the property mortgaged, counsel fees, and other expenses incident to and attending the assignment and the execution of the trusts thereunder, to be applied to creditors who accepted.and released, and, then to all other creditors. The Circuit decree was as follows: The…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice MoGowan.
The plaintiff above named claims to recover of the defendant the following personal property, viz.: Six printing presses, one lot of pulleys, shafting, belting, and *77machinery, one lot of type stands, one stove, and one lot of stereopticon plates, which property is sitúate on the premises, No. 153, Bast Bay, in the city of Charleston. The following are the facts upon which the said controversy depends, “agreed upon in a controversy without action.”
J. IT. E. Stelling was a tenant of the plaintiff, and as such tenant rented the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Morgan Silver Plate Co. v. Bobo Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- In re BishopDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1907