Legal Opinion
Harold Glass v. Philadelphia Electric Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 4, 1994No. 92-1896PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
Harold Glass appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the Philadelphia Electric Company (“PECO”) in his action claiming race discrimination, age discrimination, and retaliation in employment. Glass alleges that the district court abused its discretion when it repeatedly made evidentiary rulings against him, excluding his evidence concerning the allegedly racially hostile work environment at PECO’s Eddystone Plant (the “Eddystone evidence”) where he worked from 1984 to 1986. Glass claims that he was substantially prejudiced by the district court’s rulings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 359, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,983 Carmen L. Robinson Nathaniel Hawthorne, Jr., Wife and Husband v. City of Pittsburgh, Earl Buford, Craig B. Edwards James N. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- James West v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.