Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Redevelopment Auth. of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2007No. 36 EAP 2006Published

1DissentJustice Baer

I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s conclusion that taking private property through condemnation and transferring that property for nominal consideration to a religious partnership to develop a religious school does not have the principal effect of advancing religion. I believe that this government action provides direct aid to a religious school in violation of the Establishment Clause, and would therefore affirm the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the taking was unconstitutional.

As part of a redevelopment plan in Philadelphia, the City of Philadelphia’s Planning Commission…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API