In Re Redevelopment Auth. of Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Baer
I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s conclusion that taking private property through condemnation and transferring that property for nominal consideration to a religious partnership to develop a religious school does not have the principal effect of advancing religion. I believe that this government action provides direct aid to a religious school in violation of the Establishment Clause, and would therefore affirm the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the taking was unconstitutional.
As part of a redevelopment plan in Philadelphia, the City of Philadelphia’s Planning Commission…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.