Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Apfel
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 26, 1998No. 96-K-1464Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON APPEAL
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Kay Martinez, appeals from a final decision by the Social Security Commissioner denying her benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act). This denial was based on an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) finding that Martinez had the residual functional capacity to perform a significant number of jobs in the national economy. Jurisdiction exists under 42 U.S.C. sec. 402(g).
Martinez asserts two grounds for her appeal. First, she argues the ALJ’s conclusion that she could perform a full range of sedentary jobs is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Rhonda Kay RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.